Software Testing Sample Phrases To Write A LinkedIn Recommendation Or Profile Comments
His software is rock solid, reliable and tested to the extreme.
John led the testing teams that put our software through the races.
In his free time, he finds himself downloading and stress testing software.
In addition to testing, he is very talented at integrating software.
John creates excellent test data to verify that the software is working as described in the software requirements.
He takes pride in his work, and always come up with great ideas for the software that he is testing.
He also had a good understanding of software testing principles, tools and techniques.
He created a detailed test procedure for hardware and software.
John also contributes much to the organisation beyond delivering software.
There seems to be no software challenge he is not capable of overcoming.
He's been really open to helping us take our software to the next level.
His involvement goes beyond the running of his own software company.
When needed he was also quick to make adaptations to the software.
John is definitely an "ace in the hole" for any software company.
And him effective use of software made him an invaluable asset.
Simply put, he makes sure better software reaches the end-user.
His software and approach is both compiling and breakthrough.
He even figured out how we could get more from our collaboration software, our company.
At our company, we had to create an entirely new category of software.
He is brilliant and knows our company software like no other.
His understanding of the our company software is exceptional.
John really knows his stuff when it comes to our company software.
John makes sure his team has the needed hardware, software or additional help to do the testing.
John is one of the early users of our software and he was extremely helpful during and after the software rollout
His contribution made really steady software and the software became a good asset to our company.
His test plans and test cases were always accurate and comprehensive.
John's expertise was certainly tested when helping us with our first home.
His abilities are well tested and can be relied upon for his each word.
His experience in doing so has been tested globally over many years.
He truly understands requirements and how to adapt them to testing.
He empowers those around him to innovate and test new methodologies.
John displays an innovative and thorough approach to testing.
We were trying out new our company techniques of exploratory testing.
He makes excellent presentations of coding standards, new software and testing techniques.
He often goes beyond the test plan to ensure the quality of our software.
His primary function was to test new features and bug fixes, and to perform exploratory testing on our software.
John has an excellent approach to testing: he clearly defines the objectives, and focuses on what how users actually use the software.
His attention to detail was so great that he frequently found bugs in the software that could only be found with thorough testing.
His great ideas how to improve the software and his changes he made to it were always a pleasure to review and test.
You can be sure that user will not experience any nasty surprises with a software which was tested by him.
He helped us with testing of our software and provided some very professional and helpful feedback.
He uncovered a large number of software defects with his thorough testing techniques.
He successfully improved the company's software deploying extensive test suite
John provided service to our company from our company, specifically software testing.
During that time, he focused on all the different aspects of testing the software we produced.
John is very organized and is always only one or two clicks away from whatever test he is asked to pull from his impressive test suite.
He brings "repeatability" to test and puts the right amount of effort into preparing for testing.
He frequently helped out our company to test a feature or to do benchmark testing.
He pretty much defined the software testing methodologies in his role when the whole testing field was in its nascent days.
His our company test plans are detail oriented with test cases that targeted all the bells and whistles of the software being tested, on different platforms.
He is focused on testing automation and regression testing, where he did very well.
His track record of software testing methodology speaks for itself.
There was no difference for him are we talking about software or hardware.
He believes in innovation, software, and, most of all, in people.
John excels in all areas of software release/build/management.
John is always responsive to his software and hardware needs.
Sig's software and hardware experience makes him truly unique.
He never tried to sell him any hardware or software directly.
His software had to interface with his hardware and firmware.
John is, apart from being a very good guy, also well versed in the ways of testing, test frameworks and good test practices.
He has constantly coached us with his rich experience in software testing.
If that wasn't good enough, he's always out to better and test his abilities against him peers.
But before he went into the test centre he did the exercise again without him asking him.
His dedication to thorough testing was evident in every one of our interactions.
If he was an athlete, he'd be getting tested every week to see what he was about
John would move on to become one of the mentors within the testing group.
John's way of interacting with our test participants was exceptional.
John is passionate about testing and everything related to it.
John always follows up to ensure that our company has what we need to test his code.
He has excellent knowledge in our company testing and an expert in a lot of software testing tool.
He helped to install software and removed problems from our linking software.
John is very thorough and had a strong knowledge base of the platforms where he tested software.
Johndra seemed to be well versed in software testing, planning and execution.
He built, from scratch, one of the advanced software testing labs in our company.
Build automation software to test complicate applications such like our company is not easy.
He keeps himself up-to date with the latest trends in software testing and guides the team to explore new tools/new ways of testing.
His dedication to those around him and the software that he promotes is second to none.
Never having used our automation software before, he came up to speed fairly quickly.
John learned the software on his own and understood it better than anyone else.
Analytic in his approach and always promoting software excellence.
He can figure any tool out and is very adaptable to new software.
He can deliver any software application that you can envision.
John is very meticulous when he is writing test plans and test cases, so you can be sure that your feature has good test coverage.
He is very helpful to his group in getting our company testing scheduled for our various software components.
Not only did he stabilize our integration test framework and increased test coverage.
He like himself doesn't believe in the "vapour ware" software fix which is rare when you get into any form of software solutions.
He understands a vast range of software which gives him the edge in learning new software.
His professionalism and approach to testing is very detailed and he's incredibly knowledgeable about all the software he tests.
He does comprehensive testing to ensure that he provides you the right solution.
The test automation would not have been as successful without his contribution.
John understands how to get the most out of an automated testing effort.
In fact, he has co-ordinated testing of different releases simultaneously.
His strategies are time-tested and he knows how to get the things done.
He proactively provides ideas about where to focus while testing.
In addition to that, he has experience with automated testing.
Because of this, our company was always provided with well tested and robust solutions.
When he started with our bureau, we did not a formal software testing process.