He also was a thorough test engineer.
Recommended for employment in any field, both in engineering and outside engineering.
John is one of our finest test engineers and is extremely thorough in all aspects of testing.
Both in the test organization and the engineering team.
He is a thorough test engineer and is very analytical.
John is an excellent and imaginative test engineer.
He is one of the best test engineers I was ever working.
Without the particular tests it would be much more efficient to make the changes needed and the tests were not testing anything except our patience.
He's an engineer's engineer, and is someone you just want to go into battle with as a leader.
He is cognizant of engineering needs and kept engineers in the loop when appropriate.
John understands what engineers want and he accommodates engineers' needs very well.
John is exactly the sort of engineer that other engineers want to work with.
It's unlikely we could have come up with such an engine without his help.
He did this not just with engineering, but with the whole company.
He is always willing to help when an engineer needs assistance.
John is one of the best engineers one can have on their team.
He is very approachable and he looks out for his engineers.
John is one of those engineers you wish you could clone.
John is always that engineer who is up to the challenge.
John is much more than being just an excellent engineer.
I found him to be very professional in his engineering.
He also got us into the feasibility and value engineering.
John is also not to be underestimated as an engineer.
I can't recommend him enough for any other engineers.
John was definitely one of my go-to back-end engineers.
John is a great test engineer, especially when it comes to organizing various testing activities.
He was a key engineer in our going from 0% automated testing to near 90% automated testing.
He was very thorough in his testing, and his test reports were well detailed.
He was very thorough in him test scripts and testing efforts.
Not only does he have tests, but his tests pass every time.
John has one of our best test leads on the test team.
He is an engineer's engineer, but with social graces (mostly) at the same time.
John is hardworking engineer with the right attitude for project engineering.
John was an extremely thorough engine design engineer.
He is directly responsible for such testing requiring very little time for myself and the other engineers.
John is passionate about achieving excellence in test engineering.
Lastly, his technical tests for interviewing engineers were legendary.
I must say he will be a key test engineer in any organization.
John is truly a detail oriented and thorough test engineer.
An excellent test engineer, couldn't slip anything past him.
John is a thorough and dedicated system test engineer.
John is one of the few really inspired test engineers I've known.
John is the best test engineer, I've ever worked with - period.
It is my pleasure to recommend John as a test engineer.
He makes sure that everything he does is well documented and tested.
He will tell you exactly what you need to do to pass the test.
Lucky for us, as that means we get to keep him in testing.
He is very consistent and thorough in his testings.
His test plans are thorough and him testing rigorous.
I hired John out of our engineering department to become an inside sales engineer with two other sales engineers.
John is most notably an engineering leader and he knows how to successfully lead other engineers.
Being an engineer himself, he contributed to the technical growth of every engineer in his team.
Invaluable asset for any engineering company as an invention and innovation engine.
He helped me transition from chemical (process) engineering to database engineering.
A very sharp engineer, he was highly regarded within the engineering organization.
John is a fantastic engineer who strives for engineering excellence.
I would define him as a systems engineer's systems engineer.
I had the pleasure of working with John while he was an engineer and when he became an engineering leader.
With regard to his engineering prowess, John is a do-it-right engineer.
If necessary, he will pull in engineering to make sure that everything is correct.
Raju is the type of test engineer that never settles on what he is doing well at the time.
It was highly scalable and well tested by him before he handed it off to test.
Dedicated and excellent test engineer ever seen in his career.
He would not let anything out the door until it was thoroughly tested.
He's extremely thorough, and always knows exactly what to test.
His passion for testing and test architecture is very contagious.
John is a reliable and hardworking engineer and he would be an asset to any company seeking an experienced test engineer.
Give him a tried and tested way of doing things that everyone uses, and he will come up with something new - and better.
He made sure we got as much testing as could be allowed, and still make our deadlines.
Don't believe him, do the taste test yourself and you too will be hooked.
He carried out through and end to end testing for all the assignments.
He knows how to keep his calm, even in the most testing situations.
He is very thorough and he was very familiar with the test suite.
John is very spontaneous and was very helpful towards testing.
Count on him to test every option until the right one is found.
He knows how to get things done, from a test-first perspective.
He challenges himself and others around him to test new ideas.
He would thoroughly test the telemetry and help the engineers investigate the problem.
John is a great asset as a testing engineer, he writes efficient test cases and while testing can think of the possibilities beyond someone's imagination.
If there's a scenario to test, he will thoroughly test it from end to end and find every issue possible.
If it weren't for his regression testing and bug verifications, we would have missed testing timelines.
Subra (as we fondly call him) is very thorough with his basics on testing and anything around testing.
His ability to test various current features/fixes, along with regression testing, is excellent.
John is an extremely determined and conscientious test engineer who was always on the case.
His code is always well thought through and thoroughly tested.
His engineering analysis skill set is a proven, tested toolset.
He made sure to keep the test team in the loop about all issues that might affect our testing.
His tenacious testing kept several bugs out of engineering samples and away from the customers.
He knows and uses the best available tools for testing and tuning.
John showed that he was a very competent test engineer during his time at our company.
He wants to know the why and how, and will test your resolve to make sure you do have the courage of your convictions.
John new projects/proposals in testing, we can always go to him to get the enough input/feedback from him.
John's testing was always very thorough and he swiftly came up to speed with any new systems/processes.
Besides, he is not afraid of trying new things, and testing new platforms and new approaches.
If he can't challenge your testing paradigms, then you must not want them challenged.
John really "walks the walk" and everything he recommends has been tried and tested.
The only reason why one out two didn't pass was that he didn't sit in for the test.
Furthermore, he tested the organisations understanding of what was truly needed.
He put his know how to the test and his workmanship was nothing but perfection.
We could talk about and idea one second and next second he was out testing it.
Under his leadership, numerous initiatives were taken, tried and tested.
He is always dependable and very efficient in his testing methodology.
He always pushes through and is willing to test new ideas and concepts.
His testing was methodical, thorough, and quick without being careless.
His tried and tested methodology will deliver what you are looking for.
He looks for new ideas, and is happy to test them in the marketplace.
And he maintained checklists that he would run through while testing.
He never stopped with the assignments or the test given in the class.
What makes him stand out is the fact he puts everything to the test.
He always has great new deals that he's willing to let us test out.
His ability to think outside the box lent very well to his testing.
He tests, gets feedback and iterates until things are done right.
You can test both of these by telling him he is no good at hockey.
John takes on challenges to test himself and his methodologies.
John is very good in doing testing from the user's perspective.
John issues that are found in testing are addressed without delay.
And he will have tested the ideas to destruction before you can.
His tips and tricks were relevant to what you'll see on the test.
Working with volunteers, is to him, the final test of leadership.
This is coming from someone who tested his features extensively.
Everybody was impressed how deep he can dig during his testing.
His contribution outside the test organisation was very visible.
More than that, he was also able to deploy, test, and prototype.
He accomplishes this by testing everything and assuming nothing.
He's always one to test boundaries without stepping beyond them.
His ideas are often unique and different, yet tested and proven.
John is all about testing and has a knack for experimentation.
He loves it and has been tested in very difficult situations.
Then he would start to test for the most insane circumstances.
His abilities were limitless with regards to testing anything.
He is not scared to test out new concepts and try new things.
He is battle tested and experienced and can help you succeed.
He went on to pass the our company test on his first sitting.
He took time to understand what he was testing, and always thought of testing with an "out-of-the-box" mentality which is required out of our company engineers.
John's test approaches was so good that there was not a single hiccup even at the end of the testing cycle
In short, his testing efforts were so extensive it made the user acceptance testing appear redundant.
There is basically no search engine optimization strategy that he doesn't know about and didn't test out on his own.
He gave him many good concepts about engineering, manufacturing and also testing.
He helped him to set priorities and become a better test automation engineer
He is very much appreciated by engineering and our company as he regularly helps with deployments and testing.
He did the same with the team under very testing and trying situations.
The test team has indicated that he is the best in this regard.
His experience in the testing space shone through and against all odds delivered the test sign off for a test model that consisted of several thousand test scripts.
John also started a number of test automation initiatives in both engineering and manufacturing to improve test coverage and to speed up testing.
He always thoroughly tests his code and tries to bring it to perfection.
He will always test the limits, but is amazing at taking direction.
John company that considers itself serious about top-notch test engineering would be lucky to have him.
John is a sharp and reliable test engineer and a fantastic colleague.
He's a clever test engineer, friendly, open minded and proactive.
Vish is a solid our company test engineer who will do what is needed to have the company succeed.